Mets vs. Yankees 2008
Let us take a little quick and dirty look at the Mets and the Yankees.
2006 2007Basically, the Mets outfield is far better. I even added an extra player on the Yankees end and the 2007 numbers from the Mets compare favorably despite Alou only playing in 84 games. The Mets could quite conceivably have all three of their outfielders be more valuable and more productive than any of the four Yankee outfielders. Furthermore, two Yankee outfielders posted a sub .400 SLG% which is just terrible. Barring a breakout year from Melky and Abreu discovering his 2002 form again, this is no contest.
AGE OPS+ WS Warp1 OPS+ WS Warp1
RF Ryan Church 29 131 10 2.5 114 19 5.4
CF Carlos Beltran 31 150 38 11 126 27 8.4
LF Moises Alou 41 132 15 4 138 12 3.7
total 63 17.5 58 17.5
2006 2007
AGE OPS+ WS Warp1 OPS+ WS Warp1
RF Bobby Abreu 34 126 28 3 114 19 4.8
CF Melky Cabrera 23 95 13 3.1 89 13 4.4
LF Johnny Damon 34 115 22 4 97 15 3.5
?? Hideki Matsui 34 128 6 2.3 123 17 4
total 69 12.4 64 16.7
2006 2007Predictably this was not all that close given the huge difference in talent at second and behind the plate for the Yankees. Giambi and Delgado are not as bad as people are making them out to be and first, short, and third are basically a push for me. I do think Posada is going to lose quite a bit of production, but still be far more valuable than the Mets tandem. Of course the Yankees need mega production from their infield because their outfield is going to be one of the worst offensive outfields from any contender.
AGE OPS+ WS Warp1 OPS+ WS Warp1
1B Carlos Delgado 36 131 24 4.8 103 14 4.7
2B Luis Castillo 32 93 17 2.2 91 14 2.1
SS Jose Reyes 25 115 29 4.1 103 24 7.3
3B David Wright 25 133 32 7.3 150 34 10.6
C Schn / Castro 72/83 12 4.3 77/127 17 4.8
total 102 22.7 86 29.5
2006 2007
AGE OPS+ WS Warp1 OPS+ WS Warp1
1B Jason Giambi 37 148 23 5.9 108 6 5
2B Robinson Cano 25 126 18 7.1 120 21 9.2
SS Derek Jeter 34 132 33 9.1 121 24 6.1
3B Alex Rodriguez 32 134 25 5.2 177 39 11
C Jorge Posada 36 122 24 7.5 154 26 8.2
total 123 34.8 116 39.5
2006 2007This was a tough one given the two rookies in the Yankee rotation, but I think both will do decent. However, counting on them for oodles and oodles of innings while not going through any growing pains just does not seem right to me. Even if you say Joba and Kennedy are going to switch roles later in the year, which I do not expect to happen, giving them a fresh arm and thereby limiting any potential growing pains, I expect the Mets rotation to be far more balanced, far more consistent, and flat out better. The Mets rotation is one of the top rotations in the league and feature three 15 game winners. Sure the Yankees could have three fifteen game winners, but that would be more of a function of offense then pitching. Giving the Yankees the edge here would be a stretch.
AGE ERA+ WS Warp1 ERA+ WS Warp1
Johan Santana 29 161 25 10.8 130 18 9.1
Oliver Perez 26 67 6 0.1 120 11 3.7
John Maine 27 121 5 2.4 109 11 5.2
Pedro Martinez 36 97 5 2.5 166 2 0.9
The Duque 42 96 6 3.2 115 10 4.3
total 47 19 52 23.2
2006 2007
AGE ERA+ WS Warp1 ERA+ WS Warp1
Chien-Ming Wang 28 124 17 7.9 121 16 7.5
Andy Pettitte 36 106 12 5.2 110 14 6
Phil Hughes 22 - - 100 4 1.8
Ian Kennedy 23 - - 236 2 3.2
Mike Mussina 39 129 15 6.7 87 6 3.2
total 44 19.8 43 20.3
2006 2007Joba's 1192 ERA+ will not last, but it is hard to say he will not be the one of the best set up men, if not the best, in the bigs. I say I give the Yankees the edge on their closer and main set up man, but the Mets pull ahead with their #3 and #4 guys. Also, the Mets top two are not exactly chopped liver and are elite pitchers in their genre as well. I give bullpen the edge to the Mets slightly because of their depth, but the Yankees do have some room for growth here if Hawkins is solid again and a guy like Ohlendorf or Ramirez steps up. I think both bullpens have the potential to be very good.
AGE ERA+ WS Warp1 ERA+ WS Warp1
Billy Wagner 36 195 12 6.5 162 11 5.1
Aaron Heilman 29 120 8 3.4 140 9 4.1
Pedro Feliciano 31 209 8 3.8 138 6 2.3
Duaner Sanchez 27 168 6 2.4 - -
total 34 16.1 26 11.5
2006 2007
AGE ERA+ WS Warp1 ERA+ WS Warp1
Mariano Rivera 38 251 14 8.3 142 9 5.5
Kyle Farnsworth 32 104 4 2.7 93 3 0.9
Latroy Hawkins 35 102 4 1.6 140 5 2.6
Joba Chamberlain 22 - - 1192 4 1.8
total 22 12.6 21 10.8
Top to bottom, the Mets are a slightly better team by my crude estimation. If Hughes and Kennedy both have Verlander-esque rookie seasons while Joba does his best Zumaya impression, the Yankees could pull ahead because they do have a better offense. Basically, both New York teams are very good and many call the Yankees the second best team slightly behind Red Sox. That makes the Mets right behind the Red Sox as well as the second or third best team in the majors. I like the Tigers in the fourth spot slightly ahead of the Indians, but I need to see their rotation hold it together before I start saying they are as good as the well balanced Met and Yankee teams.
My top fifteen teams:
Elite
1) Red Sox
2) Mets
3) Yankees
4) Tigers
5) Indians
Studs
6) Cubs
7) Angels
8) Dodgers
9) D-Backs
10) Blue Jays
11) Braves
On the bubble
12) Phillies (cry me a river Philly fans about how you won the division and deserve some respect)
13) Milwaukee
14) Mariners
15) San Diego (not only does San Diego mean whale's vagina, but their offense is going to be atrocious)
Before anyone starts complaining, the teams within each category are pretty close to being interchangeable for me. As for the Rockies, they are just not on the list. I'm not seeing how they are better than any of those teams. Their historic run was fun and all, but they are an 84 win team.
Jason (NYC): Speaking of Nate Silver's PECOTA, did you see the Mets with 96 wins :) I'm extra giddy.
Rob Neyer: Yeah, and you should be giddy. They added the best pitcher in the world to the best team in the National League. If there's one team that's most likely to win 100 games this season it's the Mets.
They are good. Very good.
John (San Diego): MLEs?
Rob Neyer: Major League Eqivalencies, John. Based on minor-league stats. Big part of the literature.
Simply said, we should have a pretty good idea of how these players should fare. These are all humans and things can happen like not being able to perform on a certain stage, but if a team has a need and a player profiles well in regards to fitting that need, why play games and bat them 7th and have them earn their way up? Why not let them have the spot from day #1 and adjust as needed later?
David Wright has been the best hitter on the team since midway through 2005. The fact that he was not batting higher than fifth with any regularity until midway through the 2007 is absolutely laughable. If the skill is there, why not let them add meaningfully from day one?
The Cubs have a serious OBP issue. They were 9th in the NL in OBP, got a .341 OBP from the #1 spot, and a .336 from the #2 spot. Fukudome has a .406, .401,. 367, .430, .438, and .443 OBP over the past six seasons. That is insanely good. He certainly seems like a guy that can fill a need and he may not be used to do it. Instead, he will miscast as the 5th hitter to break up some righties despite the fact he is not going to hit with much homer power. This all seems elementary to me and I see no reason to screw around. Get it right from day one.
Were the Mets ever officially called the Metropolitans? Or is this just a common mistake among fans? We're having a two-day argument at work about this and would really appreciate a resolution.
-- Daniel G., Astoria, N.Y.
The New York Metropolitan Baseball Club Inc. once was the corporate name. Mets was the team name. People would refer to them as the Metropolitans in much the same way that folks refer to Mookie Wilson as William. The corporate name now is Sterling Mets, LP. It had been Sterling Doubleday Enterprises, LP.
"This year," Martinez said, "you'll see me."
Strangely enough, I think Willie hit the nail on the head.
"I'm sure he might have heard people say that other teams were upset about it and it was too much," Randolph said. "But that's stuff that Jose doesn't think about. We don't think about it. When we're having fun, and the kids are expressing themselves, they're not thinking that they're showing anyone up. They don't even know someone is looking at them.
"No one should be looking at them, really. The fans notice it, the media might see it, but if I'm on the other side, if I need to concern myself with that, your head's in the wrong place."
Good stuff. Omar also has the right outlook.
Added Minaya: "I think the beauty of Jose is the joy that he plays with. But that's his decision. I would never encourage him not to do it. It's just that when things don't go well, people highlight stuff like that."
Labels: 2008 season, mets vs. yankees











